Fatcow vs Lunarpages

Posted by: Admin  :  Category: Web Hosting Comparison

Linux Cpanel shared hosting: 600 GB disk space, 6 TB bandwidth, free domain, unlimited databases and ftp accounts, web hosting cheap and pro at Hostony

Who says that Fatcow suck? Which is one of the best hosting services out there? Our Fatcow review may shock you. Discover how we arrived at the important conclusion below.

Hosting costs

The most obvious thing to do first is to compare the prices and features at Fatcow and Lunarpages. The cheaper option for hosting a simple WordPress blog or e-commerce shopping cart is clearly Fatcow. If you just need to have one website on one domain, require a reasonable amount of storage space and visits-per-day, and want a few email accounts, then Fatcow, priced from $ 3.67 per month is easily the winner. If you need to host unlimited domains and require high CPU usage, then it is a different story.

Take notice that the above conclusion is only true if we compared their prices if you pay yearly, not for more years or less. Do not get sucked by the unrealistically low prices advertised by the hosting services or by other dishonest web hosting review sites. Some low prices displayed are for payment periods that are longer than 1 year. If you ask us, we do not believe in paying for longer than one year. Why risk your hard-earned money because money paid to these companies can be well spent elsewhere. According to many successful online business owners, one year advanced hosting payment is just the right amount to pay your host.

Comparing Their Support

We believe that the most important consideration is what people are saying and have said about Fatcow and Lunarpages. From our research, there are more dissatisfied customers at Lunarpages than at Fatcow. Our research team found this out by searching for customer reviews on the web. Our dedicated team studied keywords such as “Fatcow down”, “Lunarpages bad”, “Fatcow terrible”, “hate Lunarpages”, and other so called “bad” keywords. To get the accurate analysis, our team also did look for keywords such as “Fatcow great”, “Lunarpages good”, “Fatcow fantastic”, “liked Lunarpages” and related “good” keywords.

Our research found that, more than 85.3% of customers loves Fatcow. In contrast, the same cannot be said about Lunarpages. Moreover, a different Fatcow review was also amazed by the good comments and feedbacks about Fatcow.

Popularity

Although not the most important factor, let us look the popularity of Fatcow and Lunarpages. We have gathered and analyzed some vital statistics about both web hosting companies. Based on our analysis, we found that the more talked about hosting service is Lunarpages. The statistics below shows the global Internet users who visit www.fatcow.com vs www.lunarpages.com for not only web hosting reasons, but also domain registration purposes.

Check why Fatcow is better than Lunarpages

Linux Cpanel shared hosting: 600 GB disk space, 6 TB bandwidth, free domain, unlimited databases and ftp accounts, web hosting cheap and pro at Hostony

Final Conclusion

Lastly, we summed up the above scores and came out with the conclusion about Fatcow vs Lunarpages. The information found from the above steps were given priority accordingly where the user feedbacks were given more priority. We would like to announce that Fatcow is now our favorite website provider. Here is the summary of our hosting comparison.

Fatcow vs Lunarpages
85% Support

Star rated hosting

Reliability

Star rated hosting

Features

Star rated hosting

69% Support

Star rated hosting

Reliability

Star rated hosting

Features

Star rated hosting

Do we believe that Fatcow is one of the best hosting services? Most definitely, but you do not have to take our recommendation without your own verification. You have to find out for yourself. Use coupon code below and Take 50% Off Regular Price.


Click here to visit Fatcow

Take 50% Off Regular Price. Coupon code: Visit special link

Feel free to leave your own Fatcow review below. If you have tried Lunarpages Web Hosting and you disagree with us, feel free to write your opinion on Lunarpages in the box below.

Web Hosting Comparison

Linux Cpanel shared hosting: 600 GB disk space, 6 TB bandwidth, free domain, unlimited databases and ftp accounts, web hosting cheap and pro at Hostony

Force SSL for your site with Varnish and Nginx

Posted by: Admin  :  Category: Web Hosting

Hello!

For those of you who depend on Varnish to offer robust caching and scaling potential to your web stack, hearing about Google’s prioritization (albeit arguably small, for now) of sites that force SSL may cause pause in how to implement.

Varnish currently doesn’t have the ability to handle SSL certificates and encrypt requests as such. It may never actually have this ability because its focus is to cache content and it does a very good job I might add.

So if Varnish can’t handle the SSL traffic directly, how would you go about implementing this with Nginx?

Well, nginx has the ability to proxy traffic. This is one of the many reasons why some admins choose to pair Varnish with Nginx. Nginx can do reverse proxying and header manipulation out of the box without custom modules or configuration. Combine that with the lightweight production tested scalability of Nginx over Apache and the reasons are simple. We’re not interested in that debate here, just a simple implementation.

Nginx Configuration

With Nginx, you will need to add an SSL listener to handle the ssl traffic. You then assign your certificate. The actual traffic is then proxied to the (already set up) non-https listener (varnish).

server {
        listen x.x.x.x:443 ssl;

        server_name yoursite.com www.yoursite.com;
        ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/yoursite.com.crt;
        ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/ssl/yoursite.com.key;
        ssl_protocols       TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
        ssl_ciphers         HIGH:!aNULL:!MD5;

        if ($  host !~* ^www.) {
                rewrite ^(.*)$   https://www.$  host$  1 permanent;
        }

        location / {
            # Pass the request on to Varnish.
            proxy_pass  http://127.0.0.1:80;

            # Pass some headers to the downstream server, so it can identify the host.
            proxy_set_header Host $  host;
            proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $  remote_addr;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $  proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;

            # Tell any web apps like Drupal that the session is HTTPS.
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https;

            proxy_redirect     off;
        }
}

The one thing to note before going further is the second last line of the configuration. That is important because it allows you to avoid an infinite redirect loop of a request proxying to varnish, varnish redirecting non-ssl to ssl and back to nginx for a proxy. You’ll notice that pretty quickly because your site will ultimately go down šŸ™

What nginx is doing is defining a custom HTTP header and assigning a value of “https” to it :

proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https;

So the rest of the nginx configuration can remain the same (the configuration that varnish ultimately forwards requests in order to cache).

Varnish

What you’re going to need in your varnish configuration is a minor adjustment :

if (req.http.X-Forwarded-Proto !~ "(?i)https") {
    set req.http.x-Redir-Url = "https://www.yoursite.com" + req.url;
    error 750 req.http.x-Redir-Url;
}

What the above snippet is doing is simply checking if the header “X-Forwarded-Proto” (that nginx just set) exists and if the value equals (case insensitive) to “https”. If that is not present or matches , it sets a redirect to force the SSL connection which is handled by the nginx ssl proxy configuration above. Its also important to note that we are not just doing a clean break redirect, we are still appending the originating request URI in order to make it a smooth transition and potentially not break any previously ranked links/urls.

The last thing to note is the error 750 handler that handles the redirect in varnish :

sub vcl_error {
     if (obj.status == 750) {
     set obj.http.Location = obj.response;
     set obj.status = 302;
     return(deliver);
     }
 }

You can see that were using a 302 temporary redirect instead of a permanent 301 redirect. This is your decision though browsers tend to be stubborn in their own internal caching of 301 redirects so 302 is good for testing.

After restarting varnish and nginx you should be able to quickly confirm that no non-SSL traffic is allowed anymore. You can not only enjoy the (marginal) SEO “bump” but you are also contributing to the HTTPS Everywhere movement which is an important cause!

The post Force SSL for your site with Varnish and Nginx appeared first on Managed WordPress Hosting | Managed VPS Hosting | Stack Star.

Managed WordPress Hosting | Managed VPS Hosting | Stack Star

Dreamhost vs Downtown Host

Posted by: Admin  :  Category: Web Hosting Comparison

Why successful business owners think Dreamhost is a bad choice. Discover why we gave them the web host rating like below.

Hosting costs

The most obvious thing to do first is to compare the prices and features at Dreamhost and Downtown Host. The cheaper option for hosting a simple WordPress blog or e-commerce shopping cart is definitely Downtown Host. If you just need to have one website using one domain, require a reasonable amount of diskspace and visits-per-day, and want a few email accounts, then Downtown Host which costs $ 7.95 per month is easily the winner. If you need to host unlimited domains and need high CPU usage, then you will have to carefully look at the features and TOS of each hosting plan.

Do take note that we only compared apple to apple – i.e the costs for each hosting if you pay for 1 year. Do not get sucked by the unrealistically low prices advertised by the hosting companies or by other dishonest web hosting review sites. Some low prices advertised are for payment terms that are too long which makes the customer uneasy. If you ask us, we have heard too many horror stories about hosting company who went downhill after the first year. Why risk your hard-earned money because money paid to these companies can be well spent elsewhere. According to many successful online business owners, one year advanced hosting payment is just the right amount to pay your host.

Comparing Their Support

Secondly, we want to look at customer satisfactions at Dreamhost or Downtown Host. We would like to report that there are more unhappy customers at Dreamhost than at Downtown Host. Our research team came to this conclusion by searching for customer comments on the web. Our researchers searched for terms such as “Downtown Host down”, “Dreamhost bad”, “Downtown Host horrible”, “unreliable Dreamhost”, and other so called “bad” keywords. To get the accurate analysis, our team also had sleepless nights studying terms such as “Downtown Host awesome”, “Dreamhost good”, “Downtown Host best”, “thanks Dreamhost” and related “good” keywords.

Our research found that, more than 99% of their current and past customers think that Downtown Host is a fantastic hosting. In contrast, we were not impressed with Dreamhost. Moreover, another Downtown Host review was also impressed with the customer satisfaction record of Downtown Host.

Popularity

Although not the most important factor, let us look the popularity of Dreamhost and Downtown Host. After studying their backgrounds, we found that the more talked about hosting service is Dreamhost. The statistics below shows the global Internet users who visit www.dreamhost.com vs www.downtownhost.com for not only web hosting reasons, but also domain registration purposes.

Check why Downtown Host is better than Dreamhost

Overall Scores

Lastly, we summed up the above scores and came out with the conclusion about Dreamhost vs Downtown Host. The scores from the above research were weighted accordingly where the user feedbacks were given more priority. After much deliberation, we can safely say that Downtown Host is now our favorite web host company. Here is the summary of our hosting comparison.

Dreamhost vs Downtown Host
81% Support

Star rated hosting

Reliability

Star rated hosting

Features

Star rated hosting

99% Support

Star rated hosting

Reliability

Star rated hosting

Features

Star rated hosting

Do we believe that Downtown Host is one of the best hosting services? We have no doubt, but you do not have to believe a word we say. You have to find out for yourself. Use coupon code below and 50% off first 3 months.


Click here to visit Downtown Host

50% off first 3 months. Coupon code: No coupon needed

Please submit your own Downtown Host review below. If you have tried Dreamhost Web Hosting and you disagree with us, you can submit your opinion on Dreamhost in the box below.

Web Hosting Comparison

Use Varnish and Nginx to follow, hide and cache 301 / 302 redirects

Posted by: Admin  :  Category: Web Hosting

Hello!

Varnish is a robust, open source and stable caching solution that has been employed on many different high traffic environments with a significant amount of success.

One of the things that we have come across, specifically with environments such as Amazon Web Services is that websites tend to spread their web stack across multiple services. For example static media such as JS, CSS and image files may be hosted on Amazon S3 storage. This would require either implementing additional CNAMES for your domain (i.e. static.yourdomain.com) that point to the S3 URL, or have your CMS redirect requests for static media to the S3 backend.

Remember with S3, you have to generate the static files and copy them over to S3, so these URLs may need to be generated and maintained by the CMS often times with a redirect (301 or 302) that rewrites the URL to the S3 backend destination.

When Varnish is caching a website, and it comes across a request that is rewritten in a 301/302 redirect by the backend response (“beresp”), varnish typically will simply cache the 301/302 redirect as a response, saving that minuscule amount of processing power that needed to happen to process the request and send the rewrite. Some may argue that that is simply negligible!

Wouldn’t it be nice to actually cache the content after the redirect happens? There’s two ways one could go about doing this.

Cache 301 / 302 Redirects with Varnish 4

In simpler setups, Varnish can simply process the rewrite/redirect and change the url and issue a return(restart) to restart the request with the new URL. This means that Varnish is processing the rewrite and returning the new url so that it can be re-requested and ultimately cached. So in vcl_deliver you can add the following :

        # Cache 301/302 redirects
        if ((resp.status == 301) || (resp.status == 302)) {
               set req.url = regsub(resp.http.Location,"^http://[^/]+(.*)","");
               return(restart);
        }

The above should work for you if, lets say, you are using Varnish in front of a simple apache/nginx server that is then processing the request. If Varnish is sending traffic to another proxy (i.e. nginx + proxy_pass), then this above directive may not work for you. The reason why one may want to proxy traffic from varnish to another proxy like nginx may be in a scenario where you want to do some fancy redirection of traffic + DNS resolution. Still confused?

Lets say varnish is at the edge of a network, caching a complicated website. Requests to varnish need to go to another load balancer (i.e. an Amazon ELB). ELB endpoints are never going to be a static IP address and Varnish (as of v4) cannot do DNS resolution of hostnames on a per request basis, so you would need to proxy the request to Nginx which would handle the reverse proxy over to ELB which would then load balance the backend fetch to the CMS.

If your scenario sounds more like the aforementioned one, then you could try following the 301/302 redirect with nginx instead of varnish.

Cache 301 / 302 Redirects with Nginx

Nginx and Varnish seem to go hand in hand. They’re great together! In this scenario you are using Varnish as your edge cache and sending all backend requests to an nginx proxy_pass directive. In order to tell Nginx to follow a redirect before sending any response to Varnish (and ultimately the end-user), you can tell varnish to simply save the redirect location and return the response after redirecting back to Varnish so it can simply cache the response!

        location / {
                proxy_pass  http://backend-server.com;
                proxy_set_header Host $  http_host;
                proxy_intercept_errors on;
                error_page 301 302 307 = @handle_redirects;
        }
        location @handle_redirects {
                set $  saved_redirect_location '$  upstream_http_location';
                proxy_pass $  saved_redirect_location;
        }

You can see that the proxy_pass directive is configured normally. In the event of any 301, 302 or 307, process it with the @handle_redirects location directive. Then simply proxy pass the $ saved_redirect_location as if it were the backend server! This means that even if the proxy_pass location is not even in your Varnish configuration as a valid hostname (i.e. random S3 url) Varnish will still cache it, thinking it is backend-server.com.

Hopefully this will help someone out there!

The post Use Varnish and Nginx to follow, hide and cache 301 / 302 redirects appeared first on Managed WordPress Hosting | Managed VPS Hosting | Stack Star.

Managed WordPress Hosting | Managed VPS Hosting | Stack Star

PHP 7.1.0 Alpha 1 Released

Posted by: Admin  :  Category: Php

PHP.net news & announcements

Best Hosting Provider For A Small Business

Posted by: Admin  :  Category: Web Hosting Comparison

Listed below is a typical question about web hosting comparison:

I am looking for a good hosting provider for a small e-commerce website. Iā€™ll be using PHP and MySQL. I was wondering if anyone knows any good hosting providers and if you have any good suggestions.

 

 

Mistakes Done by a Few Business Owners

A number of store owners intend to make their own webstore site probablyĀ because they donā€™t likeĀ to spend on selling or listing their products on a few shopping or directory listing web sites or are looking for their own customized onlineĀ storeĀ that can allow their clients to shop with confidence and grow their web presence. Nonetheless, quite a number of site owners are making mistakes in choosing the incorrect eCommerce service provider that doesn’t gratify their needs and maybe the worst case scenario is having serious frequentĀ server downtimes.

Identifying the Best eCommerce Solution

As soon as an individual meant to develop an online shop, what is needed is to have a website for their online presence where their customers can refer to. Typically, a website owner will show up for the best ecommerce solutions and sign up for their hosting service. Essentially, you’ve got two principal choices in how you can publish your online store.

2 Principal Options in Publishing an Online Store

1. Self-hosted shopping carts.

The first cheaper option is self-hosted shopping carts in which you look for a free shopping cart solution for your site for instance Zencart and osCommerce. This also entails registering your very own domain name at any Ā best domain registrarĀ such asĀ GodaddyĀ orĀ NamecheapĀ and having a web hosting service account at any best host company. To achieve this, modify your domain name to be directing to your hosting company and deploy the free shopping cart application in your server via one-click installer such as Fantastico and QuickInstall. Following that, you could start modifying your own web site by adding your items, customizing the site and so on. This choice is the most affordable but require that you have a great background in web developing and programming.

Best eCommerce Web Host for Self-Hosted Sites

More than 80% of experienced Webmasters recommend to try Hostgator. If you need an ā€œunlimitedā€ hosting plan, experts usually highly recommend going with Hostgator because they are the best best domain hosting around.

What if you find out that Hostgator sucks after you signed up with them? HG has an amazingly long, 45 days money back guarantee so you have ample time to test them out. They are rated A+ by Better Business Bureau which shows their commitment to customer satisfaction. You also do not have to pay for the first month. You can just try their fully functional hosting service – you pay only $ 0.01 (you need to use the special coupon). Do you know any other hosting company that can give you that kind of assurance? Anybody can grab an account from Hostgator for almost FREE.

How to Get an Unlimited Hosting Plan for Only 1 Cent

Click the coupon below try Hostgator cPanel hosting for almost free. If you already know that Hostgator is what you want, you can even save 25% off the normal price with the Hostgator coupon 2015 below.

2. Complete Hosted eCommerce Solution

An alternative choice is the easiest nevertheless the most costly. This approach consists of selecting best hosted ecommerce software to make use of such as BigCommerce. Commonly a complete ecommerce hosting package consists of web hosting, domain name, shopping cart software, billing, inventory, web themes etc. All you have to do is set up your online store using their user friendly sitebuilder and incorperate your products.

 

Web Hosting Comparison